{"id":17612,"date":"2021-03-25T08:45:36","date_gmt":"2021-03-25T11:45:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/?p=17612"},"modified":"2021-03-25T10:58:53","modified_gmt":"2021-03-25T13:58:53","slug":"advogados-questionam-execucao-provisoria-de-penas-superiores-a-15-anos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/2021\/03\/25\/advogados-questionam-execucao-provisoria-de-penas-superiores-a-15-anos\/","title":{"rendered":"Advogados questionam execu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria de penas superiores a 15 anos"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A Abracrim &#8211; Associa\u00e7\u00e3o Brasileira dos Advogados Criminalistas ajuizou ADIn, no STF, contra a altera\u00e7\u00e3o introduzida pelo&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.migalhas.com.br\/quentes\/317601\/mantendo-juiz-de-garantias--bolsonaro-sanciona-pacote-anticrime-com-vetos\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Pacote Anticrime<\/a>&nbsp;(lei&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/_Ato2019-2022\/2019\/Lei\/L13964.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">13.964\/19<\/a>) no CPP que autorizou a execu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria da pena de pris\u00e3o superior a 15 anos de reclus\u00e3o. A a\u00e7\u00e3o foi distribu\u00edda, por preven\u00e7\u00e3o, ao presidente do Supremo, ministro Luiz Fux, relator de outra a\u00e7\u00e3o sobre a mat\u00e9ria.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img src=\"https:\/\/img2.migalhas.uol.com.br\/_MEDPROC_\/https__img1.migalhas.uol.com.br__SL__gf_base__SL__empresas__SL__MIGA__SL__imagens__SL__2021__SL__03__SL__24__SL__a994ff29-c109-4b6d-bf6b-43bd1c77fd11.jpg._PROC_CP75.jpg\" alt=\"(Imagem: Freepik)\" title=\"(Imagem: Freepik)\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>(Imagem: Freepik)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A lei 13.964\/19 alterou, no&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/decreto-lei\/del3689compilado.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CPP<\/a>, a previs\u00e3o da al\u00ednea &#8220;e&#8221; do inciso I e dos par\u00e1grafos 3\u00ba, 4\u00ba, 5\u00ba e 6\u00ba do artigo 492, autorizando a execu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria de pena de pris\u00e3o superior a 15 anos. Segundo a Abracrim, a mudan\u00e7a viola a presun\u00e7\u00e3o de inoc\u00eancia, garantia constitucional que s\u00f3 autoriza o cumprimento da pena ap\u00f3s o tr\u00e2nsito em julgado da senten\u00e7a penal condenat\u00f3ria.<\/p><div class=\"setih69e6bcd06522a\" ><!--<a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3QdrqTZ\" target=\"_blank\">\n<img src=\"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/mobile-geral.gif\"\/><a\/>--><\/div><style type=\"text\/css\">\r\n.setih69e6bcd06522a {\r\ntext-align: center;\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 1201px) {\r\n.setih69e6bcd06522a {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 993px) and (max-width: 1200px) {\r\n.setih69e6bcd06522a {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 769px) and (max-width: 992px) {\r\n.setih69e6bcd06522a {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 768px) {\r\n.setih69e6bcd06522a {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (max-width: 767px) {\r\n.setih69e6bcd06522a {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n<\/style>\r\n<div class=\"aghrg69e6bcd06520e\" ><!--<a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3QdrqTZ\" target=\"_blank\">\n<img src=\"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/desktop-geral.gif\"\/><a\/>--><\/div><style type=\"text\/css\">\r\n.aghrg69e6bcd06520e {\r\ntext-align: center;\nmargin-bottom: 1em;\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 1201px) {\r\n.aghrg69e6bcd06520e {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 993px) and (max-width: 1200px) {\r\n.aghrg69e6bcd06520e {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 769px) and (max-width: 992px) {\r\n.aghrg69e6bcd06520e {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 768px) {\r\n.aghrg69e6bcd06520e {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (max-width: 767px) {\r\n.aghrg69e6bcd06520e {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n<\/style>\r\n\n\n\n\n<p>Al\u00e9m disso, segundo a associa\u00e7\u00e3o, o dispositivo contraria a decis\u00e3o do Supremo no julgamento conjunto das A\u00e7\u00f5es Declarat\u00f3rias de Constitucionalidade&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/portal.stf.jus.br\/processos\/detalhe.asp?incidente=4986065\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">43<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/portal.stf.jus.br\/processos\/detalhe.asp?incidente=4986729\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">44<\/a>&nbsp;e&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/portal.stf.jus.br\/processos\/detalhe.asp?incidente=5440576\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">54<\/a>, em que foi reconhecido que a execu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria da pena n\u00e3o \u00e9 admitida, nos termos da&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/constituicao\/constituicao.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Para a entidade, \u00e9 necess\u00e1rio&nbsp;<em>&#8220;evitar a inseguran\u00e7a jur\u00eddica com a vig\u00eancia de dispositivo legal que afronta, diretamente, a ordem constitucional&#8221;<\/em>&nbsp;e para que n\u00e3o se fique&nbsp;<em>&#8220;\u00e0 merc\u00ea de aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o aleat\u00f3ria dos tribunais estaduais ou federais e mesmo dos ju\u00edzos de primeiro grau&#8221;<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Processo: ADIn\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/portal.stf.jus.br\/processos\/detalhe.asp?incidente=6126216\" target=\"_blank\">6.735<\/a><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Migalhas<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Abracrim &#8211; Associa\u00e7\u00e3o Brasileira dos Advogados Criminalistas ajuizou ADIn, no STF, contra a altera\u00e7\u00e3o introduzida pelo&nbsp;Pacote Anticrime&nbsp;(lei&nbsp;13.964\/19) no CPP que autorizou a execu\u00e7\u00e3o provis\u00f3ria da pena de pris\u00e3o superior a 15 anos de reclus\u00e3o. A a\u00e7\u00e3o foi distribu\u00edda, por preven\u00e7\u00e3o, ao presidente do Supremo, ministro Luiz Fux, relator de outra a\u00e7\u00e3o sobre a mat\u00e9ria.<br \/><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/2021\/03\/25\/advogados-questionam-execucao-provisoria-de-penas-superiores-a-15-anos\/\">Mais&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":8055,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17612"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17612"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17613,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17612\/revisions\/17613"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8055"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}