{"id":16053,"date":"2021-01-18T15:20:16","date_gmt":"2021-01-18T18:20:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/?p=16053"},"modified":"2021-01-18T15:20:16","modified_gmt":"2021-01-18T18:20:16","slug":"como-devem-ser-fixados-os-juros-e-a-correcao-monetaria-nas-condenacoes-gerais-contra-a-fazenda-publica","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/2021\/01\/18\/como-devem-ser-fixados-os-juros-e-a-correcao-monetaria-nas-condenacoes-gerais-contra-a-fazenda-publica\/","title":{"rendered":"Como devem ser fixados os juros e a corre\u00e7\u00e3o monet\u00e1ria nas condena\u00e7\u00f5es gerais contra a Fazenda P\u00fablica?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Rodrigo Leite<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Canal P\u00edlulas Jur\u00eddicas | STF e STJ<\/strong> https:\/\/t.me\/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"680\" height=\"366\" src=\"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/27D11F77FEB0DBADECD467F31992A6DD9727_dinheiro.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8146\" srcset=\"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/27D11F77FEB0DBADECD467F31992A6DD9727_dinheiro.jpg 680w, https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/27D11F77FEB0DBADECD467F31992A6DD9727_dinheiro-300x161.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px\" \/><figcaption>Ilustrativa<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Esse \u00e9 um tema bastante renhido&nbsp;na teoria e na pr\u00e1tica; tanto&nbsp;que foi examinado em diversos processos&nbsp;pelo&nbsp;Supremo Tribunal Federal&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<em>vide<\/em>, por exemplo:&nbsp;<strong>ADIs<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>4.357<\/strong><strong>\/DF<\/strong>&nbsp;e&nbsp;<strong>4.425<\/strong><strong>\/DF<\/strong><em>,&nbsp;<\/em>Rel. Min. Ayres Britto,&nbsp;Rel. p\/ ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Min. Luiz Fux, julgado em 14\/03\/2013,&nbsp;DJe&nbsp;19\/12\/2013&nbsp;e,&nbsp;posteriormente,detalhado no&nbsp;<strong>RE 870<\/strong><strong>.<\/strong><strong>94<\/strong><strong>7\/SE<\/strong>, Rel. Min. Luiz Fux,&nbsp;julgado em 20\/09\/2017,&nbsp;DJe&nbsp;20\/11\/2017,&nbsp;cujos&nbsp;<strong>embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;<\/strong>com&nbsp;pedido de<strong><\/strong><strong>modula\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>de&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>efeitos&nbsp;<\/strong>foram&nbsp;<strong>desprovidos<\/strong>&nbsp;em&nbsp;03\/10\/2019, DJ&nbsp;03\/02\/2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quanto aos juros e \u00e0 corre\u00e7\u00e3o monet\u00e1ria, o Supremo Tribunal Federal, ao apreciar o m\u00e9rito do&nbsp;<strong>RE 870.947\/SE<\/strong>, relatado pelo Ministro Luiz Fux, firmou a tese de que o art. 1\u00ba-F da Lei n.&nbsp;9.494\/1997, com a reda\u00e7\u00e3o dada pela Lei n.&nbsp;11.960\/2009, na parte em que disciplina os juros morat\u00f3rios aplic\u00e1veis a condena\u00e7\u00f5es da Fazenda P\u00fablica, \u00e9&nbsp;<strong>inconstitucional<\/strong>&nbsp;ao incidir sobre d\u00e9bitos oriundos de&nbsp;<strong>rela\u00e7\u00e3o jur\u00eddico-tribut\u00e1ria<\/strong>, aos quais devem ser aplicados os mesmos juros de mora pelos quais a Fazenda P\u00fablica remunera seu cr\u00e9dito tribut\u00e1rio, em respeito ao princ\u00edpio constitucional da isonomia (CR, art. 5\u00ba,&nbsp;<em>caput<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quanto \u00e0s condena\u00e7\u00f5es oriundas de&nbsp;<strong>rela\u00e7\u00e3o jur\u00eddica n\u00e3o-tribut\u00e1ria<\/strong>, a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o dos juros morat\u00f3rios segundo o \u00edndice de remunera\u00e7\u00e3o da caderneta de poupan\u00e7a \u00e9&nbsp;<strong>constitucional<\/strong>, permanecendo h\u00edgido&nbsp;o disposto no art. 1\u00ba-F da Lei n\u00ba 9.494\/1997 com a reda\u00e7\u00e3o dada pela Lei n\u00ba 11.960\/2009 (<strong>Tema 810<\/strong>&nbsp;de&nbsp;repercuss\u00e3o geral) \u2013&nbsp;<em>vide<\/em><strong>AgRg<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;no&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>REsp<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;1239167\/PR<\/strong>, Rel. Ministro Francisco Falc\u00e3o, Segunda Turma, julgado em 17\/11\/2020,&nbsp;DJe&nbsp;20\/11\/2020)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na esteira do&nbsp;entendimento&nbsp;do Supremo, ficou consolidado&nbsp;no STJ, no julgamento do&nbsp;<strong>Recurso Especial Repetitivo 1.495.146\/MG<\/strong>, Rel. Min.&nbsp;Mauro Campbell Marques,&nbsp;julgado em 22\/02\/2018,&nbsp;DJe&nbsp;de 02\/03\/2018 (<strong>Tema 905<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;do&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>STJ<\/strong>), o entendimento no sentido de que as&nbsp;<strong>condena\u00e7\u00f5es judiciais de natureza administrativa em geral<\/strong>&nbsp;sujeitam-se aos seguintes encargos:&nbsp;<\/p><div class=\"wtjvf69e04df75450a\" ><!--<a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3QdrqTZ\" target=\"_blank\">\n<img src=\"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/mobile-geral.gif\"\/><a\/>--><\/div><style type=\"text\/css\">\r\n.wtjvf69e04df75450a {\r\ntext-align: center;\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 1201px) {\r\n.wtjvf69e04df75450a {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 993px) and (max-width: 1200px) {\r\n.wtjvf69e04df75450a {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 769px) and (max-width: 992px) {\r\n.wtjvf69e04df75450a {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 768px) {\r\n.wtjvf69e04df75450a {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (max-width: 767px) {\r\n.wtjvf69e04df75450a {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n<\/style>\r\n<div class=\"oxiyt69e04df7544f4\" ><!--<a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3QdrqTZ\" target=\"_blank\">\n<img src=\"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/desktop-geral.gif\"\/><a\/>--><\/div><style type=\"text\/css\">\r\n.oxiyt69e04df7544f4 {\r\ntext-align: center;\nmargin-bottom: 1em;\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 1201px) {\r\n.oxiyt69e04df7544f4 {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 993px) and (max-width: 1200px) {\r\n.oxiyt69e04df7544f4 {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 769px) and (max-width: 992px) {\r\n.oxiyt69e04df7544f4 {\r\ndisplay: block;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 768px) {\r\n.oxiyt69e04df7544f4 {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n@media screen and (max-width: 767px) {\r\n.oxiyt69e04df7544f4 {\r\ndisplay: none;\r\n}\r\n}\r\n<\/style>\r\n\n\n\n\n<p><strong>i)<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>at\u00e9 dezembro\/2002<\/strong>: juros de mora de 0,5% ao m\u00eas; corre\u00e7\u00e3o monet\u00e1ria de acordo com os \u00edndices previstos no Manual de C\u00e1lculos da Justi\u00e7a Federal, com destaque para a incid\u00eancia do IPCA-E a partir de janeiro\/2001;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>ii<\/strong><strong>)<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>no per\u00edodo posterior \u00e0 vig\u00eancia do C<\/strong><strong>\u00f3digo Civil de&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>2002 e anterior \u00e0 vig\u00eancia da Lei 11.960\/2009<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;(<\/strong><strong>vigente desde a publica\u00e7\u00e3o no&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>Di\u00e1rio Oficial da Uni\u00e3o de 30\/06\/2009)<\/strong><strong>:<\/strong>&nbsp;juros de mora correspondentes \u00e0 taxa Selic, vedada a cumula\u00e7\u00e3o com qualquer outro \u00edndice;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>iii<\/strong><strong>)<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>per\u00edodo posterior \u00e0 vig\u00eancia da Lei 11.960\/2009<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;(DOU&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>30\/06\/2009)<\/strong>: juros de mora segundo o \u00edndice de remunera\u00e7\u00e3o da caderneta de poupan\u00e7a; corre\u00e7\u00e3o monet\u00e1ria com base no IPCA-E.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>O STJ tem decidido, ali\u00e1s,&nbsp;que&nbsp;o&nbsp;acolhimento dos embargos&nbsp;de declara\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;deve albergar a tese defendida&nbsp;<strong>em sentido mais largo<\/strong>&nbsp;do recurso, a&nbsp;alcan\u00e7ar a&nbsp;aplica\u00e7\u00e3o imediata das altera\u00e7\u00f5es legais promovidas em rela\u00e7\u00e3o ao art. 1\u00ba-F da Lei n.9.494\/1997,&nbsp;<strong>sem se descuidar<\/strong>&nbsp;do que decidiu o STF no&nbsp;<strong>RE 870<\/strong><strong>.<\/strong><strong>947\/SE<\/strong>&nbsp;(<strong>Tema 810<\/strong>) e, ap\u00f3s, o STJ no&nbsp;<strong>REsp<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;1.495.146<\/strong><strong>\/<\/strong><strong>MG<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong>ainda que&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>supervenientes<\/strong>\u00e0 apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o do recurso&nbsp;analisado. Nos&nbsp;<strong>EDcl<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;no&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>AgRg<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;no&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>REsp<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;1145245\/PR<\/strong>, Rel. Ministro&nbsp;Gurgel de Faria, Primeira Turma, julgado em 07\/12\/2020,&nbsp;DJe16\/12\/2020,&nbsp;por exemplo,&nbsp;o Tribunal proveu os embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o,&nbsp;emprestando-lhe efeitos infringentes, para sanar a omiss\u00e3o apontada&nbsp;pelo recorrente&nbsp;e, em consequ\u00eancia,&nbsp;dar parcial provimento&nbsp;ao Recurso Especial interposto,&nbsp;quantoaos consect\u00e1rios da condena\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;(no caso,&nbsp;<strong>juros<\/strong>&nbsp;e&nbsp;<strong>corre\u00e7\u00e3o<\/strong>&nbsp;adequando-se aos&nbsp;precedentes acima \u2013&nbsp;<strong>Tema 810 do STF<\/strong>&nbsp;e&nbsp;<strong>Tema 905 do STJ<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nos pr\u00f3ximos dias, postaremos os par\u00e2metros&nbsp;dos&nbsp;<strong>juros<\/strong>&nbsp;e da&nbsp;<strong>corre\u00e7\u00e3o<\/strong>&nbsp;monet\u00e1ria&nbsp;envolvendo a&nbsp;<strong>Fazenda P\u00fablica<\/strong>&nbsp;para as&nbsp;<strong>condena\u00e7\u00f5es&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>de natureza&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>tribut\u00e1rias<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong>previdenci\u00e1rias<\/strong>,&nbsp;de processos envolvendo<strong>&nbsp;servidores<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;e empregados<\/strong><strong><\/strong><strong>p\u00fablicos<\/strong>&nbsp;e nas&nbsp;<strong>desapropria\u00e7\u00f5es<\/strong>,&nbsp;sendo esse \u00faltimo ponto objeto de maiores detalhamentos&nbsp;na Segunda Edi\u00e7\u00e3o de&nbsp;nosso Leis Especiais para Concursos \u2013 Volume 39 \u2013 Editora&nbsp;Juspodivm(<a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/35QPdB2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/35QPdB2<\/a>),&nbsp;com as repercuss\u00f5es decorrentes do julgamento da&nbsp;<strong>Pet&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>12.344\/DF<\/strong>, Rel. Min.&nbsp;Og&nbsp;Fernandes, julgada em&nbsp;28\/10\/2020,&nbsp;DJe13\/11\/2020, quando o tema sofreu significativos impactos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rodrigo Leite Canal P\u00edlulas Jur\u00eddicas | STF e STJ https:\/\/t.me\/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ Esse \u00e9 um tema bastante renhido&nbsp;na teoria e na pr\u00e1tica; tanto&nbsp;que foi examinado em diversos processos&nbsp;pelo&nbsp;Supremo Tribunal Federal&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;vide, por exemplo:&nbsp;ADIs&nbsp;4.357\/DF&nbsp;e&nbsp;4.425\/DF,&nbsp;Rel. Min. Ayres Britto,&nbsp;Rel. p\/ ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Min. Luiz Fux, julgado em 14\/03\/2013,&nbsp;DJe&nbsp;19\/12\/2013&nbsp;e,&nbsp;posteriormente,detalhado no&nbsp;RE 870.947\/SE, Rel. Min. Luiz Fux,&nbsp;julgado em 20\/09\/2017,&nbsp;DJe&nbsp;20\/11\/2017,&nbsp;cujos&nbsp;embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;com&nbsp;pedido demodula\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;de&nbsp;efeitos&nbsp;foram&nbsp;desprovidos&nbsp;em&nbsp;03\/10\/2019, DJ&nbsp;03\/02\/2020. Quanto aos<br \/><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/2021\/01\/18\/como-devem-ser-fixados-os-juros-e-a-correcao-monetaria-nas-condenacoes-gerais-contra-a-fazenda-publica\/\">Mais&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":8146,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16053"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16053"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16053\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16054,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16053\/revisions\/16054"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justicapotiguar.com.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}